Strategies, Challenges, and Answers

One Injured Passenger + One Negligent Driver + Only One Policy = One Liability Recovery And Zero UIM. . . . . . . . But One Injured Passenger + Two Negligent Drivers + Two Separate Policies = Two Liability Recoveries + UIM Availability

Prior to the recent opinion of Delgado v. American Family Ins. Group, 125 Nev. 564, 217 P.3d 563  (2009), the law seemed clear on the issue of whether a passenger could recover liability benefits and underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from the same … [Continue reading]

“You Heard It Right The First Time!” The Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms and Clarifies the Salas Decision In Hall V. Enterprise Leasing Co.

In a previous blog post HERE, we discussed the case of Alamo Rent-A-Car v. State Farm.  The Alamo decision concluded that as between the personal liability coverage of the driver and the statutorily created rental car coverage or self-insurance of … [Continue reading]

The Walls Of Nevada’s Dram Shop Wonderland Castle Withstand Assault

The post "THE WALLS OF NEVADA'S DRAM SHOP WONDERLAND CASTLE WITHSTAND ASSAULT" originally appearing here has been moved to the Nevada Insurance Law blog. The post may be viewed by clicking HERE. For convenience, ALL posts related to Nevada Dram … [Continue reading]

The Walls Of Nevada’s Dram Shop Wonderland Castle Withstand Assault

In our previous blog post, Dram Shop Wonderland, we addressed attempts that have been made over the years by Nevada lawyers to impose liability on bar, tavern and hotel owners for injuries and damages caused by their inebriated guests.  We noted that … [Continue reading]

Remedies For An Automobile Insurance Company’s Breach Of Nevada’s “Promt Pay” Statute Are Administrative, Not Judical

Under Nevada law, insurance companies have an obligation to pay claims promptly.  See N.R.S. 690B.012.  But what is the remedy if the insurance companies don’t pay on time?  In the case of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Thorpe, 123 Nev. 656. 170 P.3d 989 … [Continue reading]